The Constitutional Court judgment means that Afrikaners who will take the US refugee status offer would remain South Africans.
Image: Independent Media Archives
Some of the 54 Afrikaners who were set to leave South Africa on Sunday and resettle in the US said they were left with little choice but to choose a new life abroad.
By Sunday, 49 of the 54 that had been planning to leave OR Tambo International Airport were waiting for a chartered plane coming from the US.
They said they were waiting to be vetted for pending criminal cases before they would allowed to take off.
Kirsten van Deventer, 48, an unemployed Afrikaner, said she was waiting to leave as soon as possible.
“I'm waiting to go because I have nothing in this country…I can't pay for bread. My children are hungry, I have to feed them. I have no work…I don't know if this country will let me leave,” Van Deventer said.
Meisie van Tonder, 38, from the Free State, said she felt she had no choice.
“I don't want to go anywhere…I don't have to go! But my husband is not happy here, so we have decided to go. We don't know what the future holds,” van Tonder said.
The US embassy in South Africa did not respond to questions on the criteria used to choose the people who claim to have been persecuted.
However, they had reportedly notified the government that the first batch of Afrikaners will be leaving the country, making good on its offer of "refugee status" for those seeking to leave.
The US Department of Health and Human Services will provide assistance to the Afrikaners, including housing, basic home furnishings, and groceries.
President Cyril Ramaphosa and US President Donald Trump recently spoke, agreeing to meet to resolve tensions.
However, the South African government has maintained its hard line against the US, saying that its actions are undermining the country's sovereignty.
The Department of International Relations and Cooperation has also pushed back against the US's stance in granting the Afrikaners asylum, saying the use of the term "refugee" to describe the Afrikaners was politically motivated to further undermine the country's sovereignty.
Its spokesperson Chrispin Phiri said: "Even if there are allegations of discrimination, it is our view that these do not meet the threshold of persecution required under domestic and international refugee law."
AfriForum's Ernst van Zyl said that while the organisation is aware of the process to resettle people to the US, it is not privy to the details.
AfriForum has been accused of misinforming the Trump administration about South Africa.
The resettlement of Afrikaners in the US has sparked controversy, with many questioning the legitimacy of the "refugee status", with the South African government saying the discrimination allegations are unfounded.
International relations analyst Dr John Molepo said the resettlement of Afrikaners to the US has added to the already strained relations between the two countries.
“The two countries have disagreed on several issues, including South Africa's push to prosecute Israel for genocide at the International Court of Justice,” Molepo said.
Political analyst Sandile Swana said that for an asylum seeker or a refugee, there must be an evidence-based assessment that shows that that person has got legitimate rights that makes it impossible for them to remain in the country of their origin.
“We have many unstable areas here, whether in Eritrea, the DRC, Congo, and so on, where refugees, would come to South Africa, running away from verifiable threats that are well established.
"In South Africa, we do not have verifiable threats that target a specific ethnic group, specifically the white Afrikaners, or people who hold certain political views or certain religious beliefs,” Swana said.
Cape Argus