How sycophancy harms the ANC and ANCYL: The need for authentic leadership

The struggle between genuine leadership and subservient behaviour can be starkly contrasted in any organisation. Within the African National Congress (ANC) and its youth league, the African National Congress Youth League (ANCYL), this dynamic plays a critical role in shaping the political landscape of South Africa.

The phenomenon of "bootlickers"—those individuals who gain favour not through merit but through excessive sycophancy—poses a significant risk to the core values and effectiveness of these vital political movements. Bootlickers thrive in environments where loyalty is prioritised over competence. They rise through the ranks not because they possess innovative ideas or the courage to challenge flawed policies, but because they know how to ingratiate themselves with those in power.

This behaviour, more than mere opportunism, is detrimental to the health of any organisation and, more broadly, to the movement for social and economic justice that the ANC and ANCYL were born to champion. One of the most alarming effects of this culture is the stifling of innovation. Bootlickers, in their quest to align their opinions with those of their superiors, create an echo chamber where new ideas are dismissed, and risk-taking is minimized. True progress requires a continuous influx of fresh perspectives and constructive criticism. Without these critical elements, organizations stagnate, eventually becoming irrelevant in an ever-changing political landscape.

Furthermore, bootlickers contribute to the suppression of honest voices. Those who dare to question the status quo, to speak truth to power, or to point out inconsistencies in policies may find themselves ostracised or marginalised. This demoralises vocal dissenters and discourages others from expressing their concerns, leading to a lack of accountability. Having hard conversations—about mismanagement, corruption, or ethical failings— is essential for an organisation that aspires to be an agent of change. When dissenting voices are silenced, the movement becomes increasingly vulnerable to internal decay and the erosion of public trust. Moreover, bootlicking breeds mediocrity. When the individuals closest to power lack the skill, vision, or drive to advance the organisation's goals, the consequences ripple throughout the institution.

Mediocre leadership cannot inspire greatness; it can only maintain the status quo. This lack of dynamism within the ANC and ANCYL jeopardises the movement's ability to respond promptly and effectively to pressing societal issues. South Africans today are not just looking for leaders who can echo party lines; they need visionaries willing to think critically and ambitiously about the future.

The toxic environments cultivated by bootlickers can impact morale and productivity as well. When a culture prioritises sycophancy over authenticity, ordinary members often feel undervalued and unsupported. They may become disillusioned or lose their sense of purpose, viewing the organisation as a place of favouritism rather than meritocracy. Such discontent can lead to high service delivery, resourcing issues, and diminished organisational performance.

Authentic leadership thrives on honesty, critical feedback, and respectful dissent. Great leaders do not seek praise singers; they crave truth tellers who challenge their thinking, present new ideas, and spark meaningful discussions. Leaders should not only tolerate dissent but actively encourage it, recognising that robust debate ultimately leads to better decision-making and a more resilient organisation.

The best leaders empower their team members to voice differing opinions; they foster a culture where healthy discourse is valued, and varied perspectives are sought out. Service delivery usually arises from uncomfortable conversations and the courage to confront inconvenient truths. By dismantling the toxic culture of bootlicking within the ANC and ANCYL, leaders can unlock the creativity and potential of their members. Encouraging ranks to engage with difficult questions and strive for excellence can transform the organization's landscape and galvanize it toward its foundational mission.

The peril of bootlicking within the ANC and ANCYL cannot be overstated. This culture is a barrier to innovation, accountability, and excellence. The ANC and ANCYL must prioritize building a climate of openness and meritocracy—one that fosters, rather than stifles, creativity and critical thinking. As we reflect on the legacy of those who fought for freedom and justice, let us strive to honor their values by embracing honest dialogue and encouraging brave leadership. Only then can the ANC and ANCYL align with their core mission: to combat inequality and uplift the voices of all South Africans. The time to reclaim the essence of these movements is now; let us reject bootlicking and embrace a future shaped by visionary leadership and authentic engagement.