The Socio-Economic Rights Institute has helped the homeless Dunkeld West squatters move back into the property they were squatting in. Picture: Pixabay
Johannesburg - The homeless Dunkeld West squatters, who were evicted earlier this month from a private property in Bompas Road, have settled back onto the property.
They were evicted on April 6 by the Red Ant security relocation and eviction services, with the supervision of the sheriff, who illegally evicted dozens of residents from their homes, leaving them homeless and destitute.
According to the Socio-Economic Rights Institute (Seri) the court order was not legal as it was only against preventing further people entering the property to squat. It was not an eviction order, so the previous occupiers were restored on April 9.
“The residents are hard-working members of the community who earn a meagre living in the affluent northern suburbs of Johannesburg.
“Many of them make a living as waste recyclers, car guards, informal traders and gardeners, while others carry out casual manual labour for property owners in the area. They reside in shacks and an abandoned out-building on the property, because they have nowhere else to go. Some have lived on the property for 17 years,” said Seri attorney, Khululiwe Bhengu.
In conducting the eviction, the property owners relied on an interim interdict issued by the South Gauteng High Court in February, protecting their property from further occupation. The interim interdict does not constitute an application for eviction and does not apply to the occupiers who had already been in occupation.
“The failure to seek a court order deprives the residents of the protection they are entitled to in law.
“In terms of the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998 (the PIE Act), the residents are entitled to written and effective notice of any proceedings to evict them; to be evicted only where it is just and equitable to do so; and to be provided with alternative accommodation, where an eviction would otherwise lead to homelessness.
“The residents were evicted from the property in breach of all these entitlements.
“These attacks have with a moratorium on evictions and are a direct contravention of the regulations in terms of the Disaster Management Act,” she said.
During the eviction, residents lost their homes and most had their furniture and personal possessions destroyed, resulting in the elderly and mothers with infants having to sleep on the street.
In addition to being evicted from their homes, the residents have had to endure harassment and intimidation from law enforcement and private security, she said.
The Star
