ATM urges calm and child-centred approach amid allegations involving Kaamilah Paulse

The African Transformation Movement (ATM) has called for calm and responsibility in the wake of public allegations against prominent Cape Town attorney Kaamilah Paulse, stressing the need to prioritise the rights and well-being of children entangled in ongoing legal disputes.

In a media statement released Tuesday, ATM President Vuyo Zungula said the party was deeply concerned about the emotional and psychological toll the matter may have on the children involved. “At the heart of this issue are the lives and well-being of children,” Zungula said.

“It is essential that all public discourse and legal processes keep their best interests as the top priority.”

The statement comes amid mounting controversy following a ruling by the Legal Practice Council (LPC) Appeals Tribunal, which found prima facie evidence of professional misconduct by Paulse. She stands accused of using legal tactics to alienate a Johannesburg father, Asif Casoojee, from his children.

Paulse is currently a senior attorney at Herold Gie Attorneys. Casoojee complained about being denied access to his children over a four-year legal battle with his ex-wife, whom Paulse represents.

The Tribunal ruled in March that Paulse had improperly obtained a protection order without ensuring due process and had actively contributed to restricting Casoojee’s access to his children, including their school and medical records.

The Tribunal labelled her actions as “parental alienation” and criticised her for failing to adequately respond to serious allegations, including her involvement in a WhatsApp group where confidential financial information about Casoojee was shared.

ATM has urged the Legal Practice Council to continue holding legal professionals to the highest standards. “Our justice system depends on ethical conduct and public trust,” said Zungula.

“The LPC must act with integrity and transparency, especially when the lives of children are impacted.”Retired judge and Legal Services Ombud Siraj Desai also weighed in, saying he would be monitoring the proceedings closely.

“This is a sensitive matter involving allegations of undue influence in family litigation,” Desai said.

“Such complaints are unfortunately common, and we will ensure that this one is handled thoroughly and fairly.”In a response submitted to The Star, Herold Gie Attorneys defended Paulse, saying they “strongly disagree” with the Tribunal’s findings and confirmed she intends to challenge the allegations at the Disciplinary Committee.

“No final determination has been made,” the firm stated. In her own brief comment, Paulse said, “I have served with integrity for over a decade and stand by my conduct. I trust the process and will fully cooperate.”

Meanwhile, fathers’ rights groups have rallied behind Casoojee, calling for reform in the family law system and decrying what they say is a systemic bias against paternal rights.ATM concluded its statement with a broader appeal to society:

“Let us not forget that at the centre of this story are children. Their rights, safety, and emotional well-being must be the guiding principle in how we respond as a nation.”

The matter is now before the LPC’s Disciplinary Committee, and may yet return to the High Court — where the future of one father’s relationship with his children, and the ethical standing of a legal professional, hangs in the balance.