Meyiwa trial judge offside

In a country still navigating the painful legacy of racial division, those entrusted with upholding the Constitution must be held to the highest standards of impartiality, professionalism, and respect.

It is deeply concerning that Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng, presiding over the high-profile Senzo Meyiwa murder trial, made a racially charged remark broadcast live.

The frustrated judge said “This is what happens in a South Africa run by Blacks. A White advocate will never have the gall to ask me that,” in response to a formal request by Advocate Charles Mnisi, who had advised the court that he would be unavailable on Monday due to participation in Sunday’s Comrades Marathon. 

While the judge’s frustration over delays in this long-running and emotionally charged trial may be understandable, resorting to racially divisive language is entirely unacceptable. It undermines the integrity of the judiciary and risks inflaming already fragile race relations in South Africa. Decorum in court is not just about the behaviour of lawyers and attendees, it begins with the conduct of the bench.

Judges must embody the fairness and dignity they expect from others. These comments fall far short of that standard. 

The trial of those accused of murdering Orlando Pirates and Bafana Bafana captain Senzo Meyiwa, a national tragedy, must be conducted with the utmost seriousness and integrity. 

We call on the Judicial Service Commission to urgently review these remarks and reaffirm the principle that justice must be administered without fear, favour, or prejudice.

Brett Herron, GOOD Secretary-General